章节研读

Wisdom 13 — Natural Theology and the Folly of Idolatry

The chapter distinguishes between those who misread the created order (less culpable) and idolaters who worship dead, manufactured objects (utterly inexcusable).

经文

  1. 1.对自然崇拜的愚昧 所有不知道神的男人都是本性上的愚昧，他们不能从所看见的好东西中认识那存的神，也不认识造物的主，只注意他的作品；The Foolishness of Nature Worship For all men who were ignorant of God were foolish by nature; and they were unable from the good things that are seen to know him who exists, nor did they recognize the craftsman while paying heed to his works;
  2. 2.但他们以为，或者是火、风、疾风、星辰的运行、汹涌的水，或者是天上的光体，是治理世界的神。but they supposed that either fire or wind or swift air, or the circle of the stars, or turbulent water, or the luminaries of heaven were the gods that rule the world.
  3. 3.如果人们因为喜欢这些事物的美丽而以为它们是神，那么就让他们知道，他们的主比这些更好，因为美的创造者造就了它们。If through delight in the beauty of these things men assumed them to be gods, let them know how much better than these is their Lord, for the author of beauty created them.
  4. 4.如果人们对他们的力量和工作感到惊奇，就让他们从中体会出造就他们的主更是何等有力量。And if men were amazed at their power and working, let them perceive from them how much more powerful is he who formed them.
  5. 5.因为受造之物的伟大和美丽，足以使人知道它们的创造主。For from the greatness and beauty of created things comes a corresponding perception of their Creator.
  6. 6.然而这些人是可以原谅的，因为他们也许是在寻求上帝和渴望找到祂的过程中迷失了方向。Yet these men are little to be blamed, for perhaps they go astray while seeking God and desiring to find him.
  7. 7.因为他们生活在他的创造之中，他们仍在寻求，并且他们信靠他们所看见的，因为所看见的都是美好的。For as they live among his works they keep searching, and they trust in what they see, because the things that are seen are beautiful.
  8. 8.然而，即便他们也不应被原谅；Yet again, not even they are to be excused;
  9. 9.因为如果他们有能力知道这么多，以便他们能够调查世界，他们怎么没有早些发现这些事物的主宰呢！for if they had the power to know so much that they could investigate the world, how did they fail to find sooner the Lord of these things?
  10. 10.偶像崇拜的愚蠢 但可惜，他们将希望寄托在死物上，这些人把人类手所造的东西称为神，包括用技巧锻造的金银，动物的形象，或者是古人手工雕刻的一块无用的石头。The Foolishness of Idolatry But miserable, with their hopes set on dead things, are the men who give the name “gods” to the works of men’s hands, gold and silver fashioned with skill, and likenesses of animals, or a useless stone, the work of an ancient hand.
  11. 11.一位技艺高超的樵夫可能轻松地砍倒一棵易于处理的树，并巧妙地剥去它所有的树皮，然后用漂亮的工艺制作出一件有用的器皿来满足生活的需求，A skilled woodcutter may saw down a tree easy to handle and skilfully strip off all its bark, and then with pleasing workmanship make a useful vessel that serves life’s needs,
  12. 12.并用他工作中废弃的碎片来煮他的食物，并吃饱。and burn the castoff pieces of his work to prepare his food, and eat his fill.
  13. 13.但他从中挑出一块被丢弃的木头，这块木头没有任何用处，弯曲而且满是结节，他在闲暇时精心雕刻，并用在无所事事中练就的技巧塑造它，他把它塑造成人的形象，But a castoff piece from among them, useful for nothing, a stick crooked and full of knots, he takes and carves with care in his leisure, and shapes it with skill gained in idleness; he forms it like the image of a man,
  14. 14.或者把它像无用动物一样，给它涂上红漆，把它的表面涂成红色，用漆遮盖它的每一个瑕疵；or makes it like some worthless animal, giving it a coat of red paint and coloring its surface red and covering every blemish in it with paint;
  15. 15.然后他为它开凿一个适合它的壁龛，把它安置在墙里，并用铁钉将它固定在那里。then he makes for it a niche that befits it, and sets it in the wall, and fastens it there with iron.
  16. 16.因此他为它着想，免得它倒下，因为他知道它不能自助，因为它只是一座雕像，需要帮助。So he takes thought for it, that it may not fall, because he knows that it cannot help itself, for it is only an image and has need of help.
  17. 17.当他为财产、婚姻和孩子祷告时，他不以向一个没有生命的东西说话为耻。When he prays about possessions and his marriage and children, he is not ashamed to address a lifeless thing.
  18. 18.为健康他诉求于软弱的东西， 为生命他祷告死去的东西， 为帮助他哀求完全没有经验的东西， 为一途平安，他依靠无法行走的东西，For health he appeals to a thing that is weak; for life he prays to a thing that is dead; for aid he entreats a thing that is utterly inexperienced; for a prosperous journey, a thing that cannot take a step;
  19. 19.为赚钱、工作和用手获得成功，他向一件没有力量的东西求力量。for money-making and work and success with his hands he asks strength of a thing whose hands have no strength.

这段经文的意思

Wisdom 13 opens with a diagnosis of epistemological failure: people who 'were ignorant of God were foolish by nature' and could not infer the Creator from the beauty of created things (vv. 1–5). The argument is a classic move from effect to cause — the beauty and power of the visible world should lead the observer upward to 'their Lord' and 'the author of beauty' (v. 3) and to 'he who formed them' (v. 4). The chapter calls this inference a 'corresponding perception of their Creator' (v. 5), implying it is a reasonable, built-in response available to anyone who looks honestly at the world.

A partial concession follows: 'these men are little to be blamed' (v. 6). They go astray 'while seeking God and desiring to find him' (v. 6) and 'keep searching' among visible works (v. 7). Yet the concession is immediately retracted in v. 8: 'not even they are to be excused,' because the very investigative capacity that lets them 'investigate the world' (v. 9) should have led them sooner to 'the Lord of these things.' The chapter thus posits a knowledge of God available through creation that is genuine though incomplete.

The second half (vv. 10–19) abandons leniency and uses sarcasm to expose idol-making. A craftsman 'saws down a tree' (v. 11), strips its bark, makes 'a useful vessel' (v. 11), burns the leftovers 'to prepare his food, and eat his fill' (v. 12), then carves the castoff piece 'with care in his leisure' (v. 13) into a human likeness (v. 14), paints it red, sets it in a wall niche with iron (v. 15), and worries it might fall (v. 16). The point is not that the idol looks crude but that the maker knows it is helpless — and still prays to it 'about possessions and his marriage and children' (v. 17), appealing to a 'lifeless thing' (v. 17), 'weak' (v. 18), 'dead' (v. 18), 'utterly inexperienced' (v. 18), 'that cannot take a step' (v. 18), and 'whose hands have no strength' (v. 19). Each petition is paired with the idol's obvious incapacity, turning prayer into farce.

背景

The curated chapter note simply records that Wisdom 13 is a backfilled chapter, indicating that what is given here is the text of the chapter itself, without additional commentary supplied alongside it. No surrounding chapters or historical framing are provided in the input, so any setting of the passage must be drawn from the verses as they stand. Within the chapter, a structural break is visible at v. 10, where the subject shifts from those who worship cosmic elements (fire, wind, stars, water — v. 2) to those who worship manufactured idols (gold, silver, carved images — v. 10), and the tone shifts from qualified concession (vv. 6–9) to open mockery (vv. 11–19). The chapter closes by cataloguing six domains of petition — possessions, marriage, children, health, life, aid, travel, and work — each answered by a deaf and immobile object.

常见问题

Why does Wisdom 13 call nature-worshipers 'little to be blamed' but idolaters beyond excuse?

Because the nature-worshiper, however misguided, is at least oriented toward the Creator and infers deity from visible beauty and power (vv. 1–5), and the text grants that they 'seek God' (v. 6). The idolater, by contrast, prays to a known lifeless artifact — a carved and painted piece of wood he made himself, and whose helplessness he already understands (vv. 14–16). The first failure is one of inference; the second is one of deliberate, knowing absurdity, and so admits no mitigation.

Does Wisdom 13 teach that people can know God from nature alone?

The chapter teaches that creation yields 'a corresponding perception of their Creator' (v. 5) and that those who study the world should 'find sooner the Lord of these things' (v. 9). So a real, though incomplete, knowledge of God through the visible order is affirmed. But the chapter does not claim this knowledge is saving or sufficient; it only judges it enough to render ignorance inexcusable (vv. 8–9), and it treats it as inferior to the direct encounter the text's full argument leads toward in the following chapters.

Why does the chapter spend so much detail on how an idol is made?

The detailed craftsmanship account (vv. 11–16) makes the absurdity concrete: the same wood becomes firewood, a useful vessel, and a painted image; the artisan eats his fill from the scraps, then shapes another piece into something he will pray to. The narrative then lists six petitions and matches each with the idol's corresponding incapacity (vv. 17–19). The point is rhetorical — to show that the worshiper knows, or should know, exactly what he is praying to, which is what makes the practice inexcusable rather than pitiable.

继续研读

在阅读器里读书卷导读
HomeDiscoverStudyReadMe